CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,309
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,857

LEVEL 1

2,374

35%

LEVEL 2

2,174

32%

LEVEL 3

1,470

21%

LEVEL 4

839

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,690
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,068

LEVEL 1

2,502

35%

LEVEL 2

1,876

27%

LEVEL 3

1,642

23%

LEVEL 4

1,048

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,267

LEVEL 1

1,072

33%

LEVEL 2

1,078

33%

LEVEL 3

723

22%

LEVEL 4

394

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,312
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,350

LEVEL 1

1,147

34%

LEVEL 2

891

27%

LEVEL 3

826

25%

LEVEL 4

486

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,192
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,590

LEVEL 1

1,302

36%

LEVEL 2

1,096

31%

LEVEL 3

747

21%

LEVEL 4

445

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,378
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,718

LEVEL 1

1,355

36%

LEVEL 2

985

26%

LEVEL 3

816

22%

LEVEL 4

562

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

80
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

165

47%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

57

16%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

96
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

175

47%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

31

41%

LEVEL 2

29

38%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

34

54%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

12

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,999
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,203

LEVEL 1

1,488

29%

LEVEL 2

1,716

33%

LEVEL 3

1,256

24%

LEVEL 4

743

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,319
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,289

LEVEL 1

1,522

29%

LEVEL 2

1,448

27%

LEVEL 3

1,374

26%

LEVEL 4

945

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

94

64%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

89

63%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

171
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,043

LEVEL 1

589

56%

LEVEL 2

283

27%

LEVEL 3

116

11%

LEVEL 4

55

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

211
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,161

LEVEL 1

679

58%

LEVEL 2

271

23%

LEVEL 3

151

13%

LEVEL 4

60

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,255
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,916

LEVEL 1

1,636

28%

LEVEL 2

2,025

34%

LEVEL 3

1,426

24%

LEVEL 4

829

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,615
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,033

LEVEL 1

1,707

28%

LEVEL 2

1,711

28%

LEVEL 3

1,585

26%

LEVEL 4

1,030

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

54
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 941

LEVEL 1

738

78%

LEVEL 2

149

16%

LEVEL 3

44

5%

LEVEL 4

10

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

75
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,035

LEVEL 1

795

77%

LEVEL 2

165

16%

LEVEL 3

57

6%

LEVEL 4

18

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,299
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,587

LEVEL 1

2,147

33%

LEVEL 2

2,141

33%

LEVEL 3

1,460

22%

LEVEL 4

839

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,680
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,764

LEVEL 1

2,251

33%

LEVEL 2

1,833

27%

LEVEL 3

1,635

24%

LEVEL 4

1,045

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

227

84%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

251

83%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

7

2%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,335
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,841

LEVEL 1

590

21%

LEVEL 2

916

32%

LEVEL 3

789

28%

LEVEL 4

546

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,516
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,822

LEVEL 1

563

20%

LEVEL 2

743

26%

LEVEL 3

831

29%

LEVEL 4

685

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

974
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,016

LEVEL 1

1,784

44%

LEVEL 2

1,258

31%

LEVEL 3

681

17%

LEVEL 4

293

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,174
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,246

LEVEL 1

1,939

46%

LEVEL 2

1,133

27%

LEVEL 3

811

19%

LEVEL 4

363

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,304
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,828

LEVEL 1

2,361

35%

LEVEL 2

2,163

32%

LEVEL 3

1,465

21%

LEVEL 4

839

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,684
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,034

LEVEL 1

2,483

35%

LEVEL 2

1,867

27%

LEVEL 3

1,638

23%

LEVEL 4

1,046

15%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.