NASSAU COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,234
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,779

LEVEL 1

8,389

18%

LEVEL 2

12,156

26%

LEVEL 3

13,511

29%

LEVEL 4

12,723

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29,783
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 49,482

LEVEL 1

8,987

18%

LEVEL 2

10,712

22%

LEVEL 3

14,652

30%

LEVEL 4

15,131

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12,420
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,137

LEVEL 1

3,733

17%

LEVEL 2

5,984

27%

LEVEL 3

6,581

30%

LEVEL 4

5,839

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14,130
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,468

LEVEL 1

3,987

17%

LEVEL 2

5,351

23%

LEVEL 3

7,121

30%

LEVEL 4

7,009

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13,814
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,642

LEVEL 1

4,656

19%

LEVEL 2

6,172

25%

LEVEL 3

6,930

28%

LEVEL 4

6,884

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15,653
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,014

LEVEL 1

5,000

19%

LEVEL 2

5,361

21%

LEVEL 3

7,531

29%

LEVEL 4

8,122

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

492
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

198

26%

LEVEL 3

207

27%

LEVEL 4

285

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

667
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 941

LEVEL 1

101

11%

LEVEL 2

173

18%

LEVEL 3

267

28%

LEVEL 4

400

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

60
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7,136
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,114

LEVEL 1

505

6%

LEVEL 2

1,473

16%

LEVEL 3

2,811

31%

LEVEL 4

4,325

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7,875
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,753

LEVEL 1

587

6%

LEVEL 2

1,291

13%

LEVEL 3

2,742

28%

LEVEL 4

5,133

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12,030
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,514

LEVEL 1

1,266

7%

LEVEL 2

4,218

24%

LEVEL 3

6,219

36%

LEVEL 4

5,811

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13,225
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,368

LEVEL 1

1,507

8%

LEVEL 2

3,636

20%

LEVEL 3

6,545

36%

LEVEL 4

6,680

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,270
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,693

LEVEL 1

2,146

32%

LEVEL 2

2,277

34%

LEVEL 3

1,486

22%

LEVEL 4

784

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,701
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,840

LEVEL 1

2,242

33%

LEVEL 2

1,897

28%

LEVEL 3

1,728

25%

LEVEL 4

973

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,257
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,613

LEVEL 1

4,397

35%

LEVEL 2

3,959

31%

LEVEL 3

2,758

22%

LEVEL 4

1,499

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5,255
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,470

LEVEL 1

4,531

34%

LEVEL 2

3,684

27%

LEVEL 3

3,338

25%

LEVEL 4

1,917

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25,469
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42,536

LEVEL 1

6,163

14%

LEVEL 2

10,904

26%

LEVEL 3

12,979

31%

LEVEL 4

12,490

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28,760
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 44,764

LEVEL 1

6,407

14%

LEVEL 2

9,597

21%

LEVEL 3

13,950

31%

LEVEL 4

14,810

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

765
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,243

LEVEL 1

2,226

52%

LEVEL 2

1,252

30%

LEVEL 3

532

13%

LEVEL 4

233

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1,023
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,718

LEVEL 1

2,580

55%

LEVEL 2

1,115

24%

LEVEL 3

702

15%

LEVEL 4

321

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

25,569
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42,334

LEVEL 1

5,706

13%

LEVEL 2

11,059

26%

LEVEL 3

13,031

31%

LEVEL 4

12,538

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

28,960
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 44,667

LEVEL 1

6,154

14%

LEVEL 2

9,553

21%

LEVEL 3

14,079

32%

LEVEL 4

14,881

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

665
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,445

LEVEL 1

2,683

60%

LEVEL 2

1,097

25%

LEVEL 3

480

11%

LEVEL 4

185

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

823
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,815

LEVEL 1

2,833

59%

LEVEL 2

1,159

24%

LEVEL 3

573

12%

LEVEL 4

250

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20,749
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,124

LEVEL 1

3,262

10%

LEVEL 2

7,113

23%

LEVEL 3

10,023

32%

LEVEL 4

10,726

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22,698
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,545

LEVEL 1

3,010

10%

LEVEL 2

5,837

19%

LEVEL 3

10,319

33%

LEVEL 4

12,379

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,485
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,655

LEVEL 1

5,127

33%

LEVEL 2

5,043

32%

LEVEL 3

3,488

22%

LEVEL 4

1,997

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,085
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,937

LEVEL 1

5,977

33%

LEVEL 2

4,875

27%

LEVEL 3

4,333

24%

LEVEL 4

2,752

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.