Skip to Content
Main content

BROOME COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,543
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,685

LEVEL 1

3,123

32%

LEVEL 2

3,019

31%

LEVEL 3

2,244

23%

LEVEL 4

1,299

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,197
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,299

LEVEL 1

3,397

33%

LEVEL 2

2,705

26%

LEVEL 3

2,602

25%

LEVEL 4

1,595

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,714
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,731

LEVEL 1

1,491

32%

LEVEL 2

1,526

32%

LEVEL 3

1,082

23%

LEVEL 4

632

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,022
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,044

LEVEL 1

1,629

32%

LEVEL 2

1,393

28%

LEVEL 3

1,256

25%

LEVEL 4

766

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,829
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,954

LEVEL 1

1,632

33%

LEVEL 2

1,493

30%

LEVEL 3

1,162

23%

LEVEL 4

667

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,175
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,255

LEVEL 1

1,768

34%

LEVEL 2

1,312

25%

LEVEL 3

1,346

26%

LEVEL 4

829

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

184
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

254

41%

LEVEL 2

189

30%

LEVEL 3

117

19%

LEVEL 4

67

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

221
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

284

41%

LEVEL 2

191

27%

LEVEL 3

145

21%

LEVEL 4

76

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

197
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

109

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

218
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

126

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,922
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,063

LEVEL 1

1,825

26%

LEVEL 2

2,316

33%

LEVEL 3

1,868

26%

LEVEL 4

1,054

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,458
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,433

LEVEL 1

1,979

27%

LEVEL 2

1,996

27%

LEVEL 3

2,158

29%

LEVEL 4

1,300

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 945

LEVEL 1

630

67%

LEVEL 2

222

23%

LEVEL 3

72

8%

LEVEL 4

21

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

127
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,029

LEVEL 1

668

65%

LEVEL 2

234

23%

LEVEL 3

93

9%

LEVEL 4

34

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

141
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

335

50%

LEVEL 2

188

28%

LEVEL 3

96

14%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

164
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 751

LEVEL 1

389

52%

LEVEL 2

198

26%

LEVEL 3

108

14%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,445
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,214

LEVEL 1

2,039

25%

LEVEL 2

2,730

33%

LEVEL 3

2,170

26%

LEVEL 4

1,275

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,029
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,677

LEVEL 1

2,214

26%

LEVEL 2

2,434

28%

LEVEL 3

2,473

29%

LEVEL 4

1,556

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

98
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,471

LEVEL 1

1,084

74%

LEVEL 2

289

20%

LEVEL 3

74

5%

LEVEL 4

24

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

168
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,622

LEVEL 1

1,183

73%

LEVEL 2

271

17%

LEVEL 3

129

8%

LEVEL 4

39

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,518
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,470

LEVEL 1

2,976

31%

LEVEL 2

2,976

31%

LEVEL 3

2,232

24%

LEVEL 4

1,286

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,165
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,044

LEVEL 1

3,216

32%

LEVEL 2

2,663

27%

LEVEL 3

2,581

26%

LEVEL 4

1,584

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

147

68%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

181

71%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,303
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,327

LEVEL 1

678

16%

LEVEL 2

1,346

31%

LEVEL 3

1,353

31%

LEVEL 4

950

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,546
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,289

LEVEL 1

676

16%

LEVEL 2

1,067

25%

LEVEL 3

1,427

33%

LEVEL 4

1,119

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,240
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,358

LEVEL 1

2,445

46%

LEVEL 2

1,673

31%

LEVEL 3

891

17%

LEVEL 4

349

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,651
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,010

LEVEL 1

2,721

45%

LEVEL 2

1,638

27%

LEVEL 3

1,175

20%

LEVEL 4

476

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.