RICHMOND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,700
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,165

LEVEL 1

7,494

29%

LEVEL 2

7,971

30%

LEVEL 3

6,155

24%

LEVEL 4

4,545

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,167
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,400

LEVEL 1

7,479

28%

LEVEL 2

6,754

26%

LEVEL 3

6,379

24%

LEVEL 4

5,788

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,253
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,619

LEVEL 1

3,367

27%

LEVEL 2

3,999

32%

LEVEL 3

3,014

24%

LEVEL 4

2,239

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,005
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,810

LEVEL 1

3,406

27%

LEVEL 2

3,399

27%

LEVEL 3

3,176

25%

LEVEL 4

2,829

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,447
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,546

LEVEL 1

4,127

30%

LEVEL 2

3,972

29%

LEVEL 3

3,141

23%

LEVEL 4

2,306

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,162
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,590

LEVEL 1

4,073

30%

LEVEL 2

3,355

25%

LEVEL 3

3,203

24%

LEVEL 4

2,959

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

137
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

83

26%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

192
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

100

26%

LEVEL 2

97

25%

LEVEL 3

106

27%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

41
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

44

36%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

44
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,531
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,217

LEVEL 1

249

11%

LEVEL 2

437

20%

LEVEL 3

676

30%

LEVEL 4

855

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,826
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,496

LEVEL 1

248

10%

LEVEL 2

422

17%

LEVEL 3

683

27%

LEVEL 4

1,143

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,372
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,287

LEVEL 1

2,182

18%

LEVEL 2

3,733

30%

LEVEL 3

3,557

29%

LEVEL 4

2,815

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,880
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,955

LEVEL 1

2,134

18%

LEVEL 2

2,941

25%

LEVEL 3

3,444

29%

LEVEL 4

3,436

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

616
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,586

LEVEL 1

1,868

52%

LEVEL 2

1,102

31%

LEVEL 3

454

13%

LEVEL 4

162

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

772
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,588

LEVEL 1

1,837

51%

LEVEL 2

979

27%

LEVEL 3

522

15%

LEVEL 4

250

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,003
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,636

LEVEL 1

3,068

40%

LEVEL 2

2,565

34%

LEVEL 3

1,377

18%

LEVEL 4

626

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,453
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,854

LEVEL 1

3,116

40%

LEVEL 2

2,285

29%

LEVEL 3

1,602

20%

LEVEL 4

851

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,794
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,148

LEVEL 1

3,322

17%

LEVEL 2

6,032

32%

LEVEL 3

5,495

29%

LEVEL 4

4,299

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,980
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,150

LEVEL 1

3,228

17%

LEVEL 2

4,942

26%

LEVEL 3

5,542

29%

LEVEL 4

5,438

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

906
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,017

LEVEL 1

4,172

59%

LEVEL 2

1,939

28%

LEVEL 3

660

9%

LEVEL 4

246

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1,187
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,250

LEVEL 1

4,251

59%

LEVEL 2

1,812

25%

LEVEL 3

837

12%

LEVEL 4

350

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10,491
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,542

LEVEL 1

6,508

27%

LEVEL 2

7,543

31%

LEVEL 3

6,010

24%

LEVEL 4

4,481

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11,879
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,677

LEVEL 1

6,467

26%

LEVEL 2

6,331

26%

LEVEL 3

6,169

25%

LEVEL 4

5,710

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

209
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,623

LEVEL 1

986

61%

LEVEL 2

428

26%

LEVEL 3

145

9%

LEVEL 4

64

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

288
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,723

LEVEL 1

1,012

59%

LEVEL 2

423

25%

LEVEL 3

210

12%

LEVEL 4

78

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,085
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,979

LEVEL 1

1,786

16%

LEVEL 2

3,108

28%

LEVEL 3

3,185

29%

LEVEL 4

2,900

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,530
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,379

LEVEL 1

1,503

14%

LEVEL 2

2,346

23%

LEVEL 3

3,069

30%

LEVEL 4

3,461

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,615
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,186

LEVEL 1

5,708

38%

LEVEL 2

4,863

32%

LEVEL 3

2,970

20%

LEVEL 4

1,645

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,637
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,021

LEVEL 1

5,976

37%

LEVEL 2

4,408

28%

LEVEL 3

3,310

21%

LEVEL 4

2,327

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.