Skip to Content
Main content

RENSSELAER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,755
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,168

LEVEL 1

2,216

31%

LEVEL 2

2,197

31%

LEVEL 3

1,648

23%

LEVEL 4

1,107

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,160
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,644

LEVEL 1

2,497

33%

LEVEL 2

1,987

26%

LEVEL 3

1,843

24%

LEVEL 4

1,317

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,365
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,500

LEVEL 1

1,011

29%

LEVEL 2

1,124

32%

LEVEL 3

818

23%

LEVEL 4

547

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,574
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,701

LEVEL 1

1,143

31%

LEVEL 2

984

27%

LEVEL 3

914

25%

LEVEL 4

660

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,390
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,668

LEVEL 1

1,205

33%

LEVEL 2

1,073

29%

LEVEL 3

830

23%

LEVEL 4

560

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,586
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,943

LEVEL 1

1,354

34%

LEVEL 2

1,003

25%

LEVEL 3

929

24%

LEVEL 4

657

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

145

40%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

143
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

171

41%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

92

22%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

113
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

62

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

122
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

64

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,171
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,993

LEVEL 1

1,236

25%

LEVEL 2

1,586

32%

LEVEL 3

1,308

26%

LEVEL 4

863

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,457
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,261

LEVEL 1

1,397

27%

LEVEL 2

1,407

27%

LEVEL 3

1,437

27%

LEVEL 4

1,020

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

192
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 976

LEVEL 1

534

55%

LEVEL 2

250

26%

LEVEL 3

119

12%

LEVEL 4

73

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

225
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 999

LEVEL 1

532

53%

LEVEL 2

242

24%

LEVEL 3

136

14%

LEVEL 4

89

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

166
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

263

42%

LEVEL 2

190

31%

LEVEL 3

104

17%

LEVEL 4

62

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

209
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

353

48%

LEVEL 2

179

24%

LEVEL 3

118

16%

LEVEL 4

91

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,670
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,121

LEVEL 1

1,471

24%

LEVEL 2

1,980

32%

LEVEL 3

1,586

26%

LEVEL 4

1,084

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,055
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,488

LEVEL 1

1,641

25%

LEVEL 2

1,792

28%

LEVEL 3

1,760

27%

LEVEL 4

1,295

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

85
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,047

LEVEL 1

745

71%

LEVEL 2

217

21%

LEVEL 3

62

6%

LEVEL 4

23

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

105
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,156

LEVEL 1

856

74%

LEVEL 2

195

17%

LEVEL 3

83

7%

LEVEL 4

22

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,743
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,058

LEVEL 1

2,146

30%

LEVEL 2

2,169

31%

LEVEL 3

1,643

23%

LEVEL 4

1,100

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,490

LEVEL 1

2,394

32%

LEVEL 2

1,957

26%

LEVEL 3

1,827

24%

LEVEL 4

1,312

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

70

64%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

103

67%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,941
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,672

LEVEL 1

600

16%

LEVEL 2

1,131

31%

LEVEL 3

1,103

30%

LEVEL 4

838

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,170
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,781

LEVEL 1

632

17%

LEVEL 2

979

26%

LEVEL 3

1,189

31%

LEVEL 4

981

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

814
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,496

LEVEL 1

1,616

46%

LEVEL 2

1,066

30%

LEVEL 3

545

16%

LEVEL 4

269

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

990
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,863

LEVEL 1

1,865

48%

LEVEL 2

1,008

26%

LEVEL 3

654

17%

LEVEL 4

336

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.