Skip to Content
Main content

ROCKLAND COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,661
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,350

LEVEL 1

3,387

30%

LEVEL 2

3,302

29%

LEVEL 3

2,790

25%

LEVEL 4

1,871

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,167
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,997

LEVEL 1

3,759

31%

LEVEL 2

3,071

26%

LEVEL 3

2,979

25%

LEVEL 4

2,188

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,405

LEVEL 1

1,560

29%

LEVEL 2

1,619

30%

LEVEL 3

1,356

25%

LEVEL 4

870

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

2,489
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,761

LEVEL 1

1,782

31%

LEVEL 2

1,490

26%

LEVEL 3

1,428

25%

LEVEL 4

1,061

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,435
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,945

LEVEL 1

1,827

31%

LEVEL 2

1,683

28%

LEVEL 3

1,434

24%

LEVEL 4

1,001

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,678
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,236

LEVEL 1

1,977

32%

LEVEL 2

1,581

25%

LEVEL 3

1,551

25%

LEVEL 4

1,127

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

129
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

170
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

90

34%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

728
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,077

LEVEL 1

101

9%

LEVEL 2

248

23%

LEVEL 3

373

35%

LEVEL 4

355

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

758
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,091

LEVEL 1

124

11%

LEVEL 2

209

19%

LEVEL 3

345

32%

LEVEL 4

413

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,339
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,785

LEVEL 1

402

11%

LEVEL 2

1,044

28%

LEVEL 3

1,311

35%

LEVEL 4

1,028

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,491
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,906

LEVEL 1

487

12%

LEVEL 2

928

24%

LEVEL 3

1,318

34%

LEVEL 4

1,173

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

408
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,904

LEVEL 1

899

47%

LEVEL 2

597

31%

LEVEL 3

292

15%

LEVEL 4

116

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

473
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,896

LEVEL 1

885

47%

LEVEL 2

538

28%

LEVEL 3

327

17%

LEVEL 4

146

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,056
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,356

LEVEL 1

1,952

45%

LEVEL 2

1,348

31%

LEVEL 3

750

17%

LEVEL 4

306

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,271
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,830

LEVEL 1

2,221

46%

LEVEL 2

1,338

28%

LEVEL 3

905

19%

LEVEL 4

366

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,471
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,551

LEVEL 1

2,161

23%

LEVEL 2

2,919

31%

LEVEL 3

2,648

28%

LEVEL 4

1,823

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,969
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,189

LEVEL 1

2,507

25%

LEVEL 2

2,713

27%

LEVEL 3

2,830

28%

LEVEL 4

2,139

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

190
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,799

LEVEL 1

1,226

68%

LEVEL 2

383

21%

LEVEL 3

142

8%

LEVEL 4

48

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

198
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,808

LEVEL 1

1,252

69%

LEVEL 2

358

20%

LEVEL 3

149

8%

LEVEL 4

49

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4,547
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,488

LEVEL 1

2,049

22%

LEVEL 2

2,892

30%

LEVEL 3

2,694

28%

LEVEL 4

1,853

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,019
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,880

LEVEL 1

2,202

22%

LEVEL 2

2,659

27%

LEVEL 3

2,846

29%

LEVEL 4

2,173

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,862

LEVEL 1

1,338

72%

LEVEL 2

410

22%

LEVEL 3

96

5%

LEVEL 4

18

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,117

LEVEL 1

1,557

74%

LEVEL 2

412

19%

LEVEL 3

133

6%

LEVEL 4

15

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,426
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,668

LEVEL 1

702

12%

LEVEL 2

1,540

27%

LEVEL 3

1,910

34%

LEVEL 4

1,516

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,711
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,895

LEVEL 1

790

13%

LEVEL 2

1,394

24%

LEVEL 3

1,949

33%

LEVEL 4

1,762

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,235
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,682

LEVEL 1

2,685

47%

LEVEL 2

1,762

31%

LEVEL 3

880

15%

LEVEL 4

355

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,456
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,102

LEVEL 1

2,969

49%

LEVEL 2

1,677

27%

LEVEL 3

1,030

17%

LEVEL 4

426

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.