Skip to Content
Main content

SCHENECTADY COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,919
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,605

LEVEL 1

3,245

38%

LEVEL 2

2,441

28%

LEVEL 3

1,691

20%

LEVEL 4

1,228

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,605
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,674

LEVEL 1

3,311

43%

LEVEL 2

1,758

23%

LEVEL 3

1,477

19%

LEVEL 4

1,128

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,404
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,072

LEVEL 1

1,466

36%

LEVEL 2

1,202

30%

LEVEL 3

839

21%

LEVEL 4

565

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,237
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,638

LEVEL 1

1,547

43%

LEVEL 2

854

23%

LEVEL 3

721

20%

LEVEL 4

516

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,515
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,533

LEVEL 1

1,779

39%

LEVEL 2

1,239

27%

LEVEL 3

852

19%

LEVEL 4

663

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,368
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,036

LEVEL 1

1,764

44%

LEVEL 2

904

22%

LEVEL 3

756

19%

LEVEL 4

612

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

87
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

160

46%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

207

53%

LEVEL 2

98

25%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

358
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,051

LEVEL 1

416

40%

LEVEL 2

277

26%

LEVEL 3

178

17%

LEVEL 4

180

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

381
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,052

LEVEL 1

432

41%

LEVEL 2

239

23%

LEVEL 3

186

18%

LEVEL 4

195

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,228
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,926

LEVEL 1

1,144

23%

LEVEL 2

1,554

32%

LEVEL 3

1,271

26%

LEVEL 4

957

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,860
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,913

LEVEL 1

1,059

27%

LEVEL 2

994

25%

LEVEL 3

1,036

26%

LEVEL 4

824

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

124
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,287

LEVEL 1

890

69%

LEVEL 2

273

21%

LEVEL 3

94

7%

LEVEL 4

30

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

130
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,260

LEVEL 1

916

73%

LEVEL 2

214

17%

LEVEL 3

92

7%

LEVEL 4

38

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 977

LEVEL 1

624

64%

LEVEL 2

232

24%

LEVEL 3

92

9%

LEVEL 4

29

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

145
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,045

LEVEL 1

691

66%

LEVEL 2

209

20%

LEVEL 3

106

10%

LEVEL 4

39

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,846
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,393

LEVEL 1

2,282

31%

LEVEL 2

2,265

31%

LEVEL 3

1,637

22%

LEVEL 4

1,209

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,545
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,600

LEVEL 1

2,405

36%

LEVEL 2

1,650

25%

LEVEL 3

1,429

22%

LEVEL 4

1,116

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

73
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,212

LEVEL 1

963

79%

LEVEL 2

176

15%

LEVEL 3

54

4%

LEVEL 4

19

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

60
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,074

LEVEL 1

906

84%

LEVEL 2

108

10%

LEVEL 3

48

4%

LEVEL 4

12

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,899
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,349

LEVEL 1

3,040

36%

LEVEL 2

2,410

29%

LEVEL 3

1,676

20%

LEVEL 4

1,223

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,581
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,394

LEVEL 1

3,081

42%

LEVEL 2

1,732

23%

LEVEL 3

1,459

20%

LEVEL 4

1,122

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

205

80%

LEVEL 2

31

12%

LEVEL 3

15

6%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

230

82%

LEVEL 2

26

9%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,381
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,485

LEVEL 1

777

17%

LEVEL 2

1,327

30%

LEVEL 3

1,300

29%

LEVEL 4

1,081

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,013
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,587

LEVEL 1

706

20%

LEVEL 2

868

24%

LEVEL 3

1,045

29%

LEVEL 4

968

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

538
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,120

LEVEL 1

2,468

60%

LEVEL 2

1,114

27%

LEVEL 3

391

9%

LEVEL 4

147

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

592
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,087

LEVEL 1

2,605

64%

LEVEL 2

890

22%

LEVEL 3

432

11%

LEVEL 4

160

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.