Skip to Content
Main content

ULSTER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,012
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,997

LEVEL 1

2,117

35%

LEVEL 2

1,868

31%

LEVEL 3

1,320

22%

LEVEL 4

692

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,420
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,620

LEVEL 1

2,358

36%

LEVEL 2

1,842

28%

LEVEL 3

1,638

25%

LEVEL 4

782

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

922
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,827

LEVEL 1

983

35%

LEVEL 2

922

33%

LEVEL 3

621

22%

LEVEL 4

301

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,147
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,130

LEVEL 1

1,088

35%

LEVEL 2

895

29%

LEVEL 3

789

25%

LEVEL 4

358

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,090
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,170

LEVEL 1

1,134

36%

LEVEL 2

946

30%

LEVEL 3

699

22%

LEVEL 4

391

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,273
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,490

LEVEL 1

1,270

36%

LEVEL 2

947

27%

LEVEL 3

849

24%

LEVEL 4

424

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

93
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

115

39%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

136
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

132

36%

LEVEL 2

99

27%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

7

64%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

119
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

64

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

37

18%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

56

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,456
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,755

LEVEL 1

1,101

29%

LEVEL 2

1,198

32%

LEVEL 3

946

25%

LEVEL 4

510

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,778
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,160

LEVEL 1

1,206

29%

LEVEL 2

1,176

28%

LEVEL 3

1,198

29%

LEVEL 4

580

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

257

56%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

61

13%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

290

59%

LEVEL 2

126

26%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

265
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,259

LEVEL 1

605

48%

LEVEL 2

389

31%

LEVEL 3

194

15%

LEVEL 4

71

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

312
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,393

LEVEL 1

681

49%

LEVEL 2

400

29%

LEVEL 3

230

17%

LEVEL 4

82

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,932
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,918

LEVEL 1

1,312

27%

LEVEL 2

1,674

34%

LEVEL 3

1,256

26%

LEVEL 4

676

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,328
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,371

LEVEL 1

1,402

26%

LEVEL 2

1,641

31%

LEVEL 3

1,565

29%

LEVEL 4

763

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

80
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,079

LEVEL 1

805

75%

LEVEL 2

194

18%

LEVEL 3

64

6%

LEVEL 4

16

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

92
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,249

LEVEL 1

956

77%

LEVEL 2

201

16%

LEVEL 3

73

6%

LEVEL 4

19

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,000
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,754

LEVEL 1

1,929

34%

LEVEL 2

1,825

32%

LEVEL 3

1,310

23%

LEVEL 4

690

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,397
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,355

LEVEL 1

2,161

34%

LEVEL 2

1,797

28%

LEVEL 3

1,621

26%

LEVEL 4

776

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

188

77%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

197

74%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,366
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,964

LEVEL 1

631

21%

LEVEL 2

967

33%

LEVEL 3

861

29%

LEVEL 4

505

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,615
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,219

LEVEL 1

693

22%

LEVEL 2

911

28%

LEVEL 3

1,042

32%

LEVEL 4

573

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

646
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,033

LEVEL 1

1,486

49%

LEVEL 2

901

30%

LEVEL 3

459

15%

LEVEL 4

187

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

805
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,401

LEVEL 1

1,665

49%

LEVEL 2

931

27%

LEVEL 3

596

18%

LEVEL 4

209

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,008
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,968

LEVEL 1

2,099

35%

LEVEL 2

1,861

31%

LEVEL 3

1,317

22%

LEVEL 4

691

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,419
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,600

LEVEL 1

2,344

36%

LEVEL 2

1,837

28%

LEVEL 3

1,637

25%

LEVEL 4

782

12%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.