WESTCHESTER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27,224
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54,247

LEVEL 1

12,781

24%

LEVEL 2

14,242

26%

LEVEL 3

14,457

27%

LEVEL 4

12,767

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29,146
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 55,154

LEVEL 1

13,405

24%

LEVEL 2

12,603

23%

LEVEL 3

14,733

27%

LEVEL 4

14,413

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13,081
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,219

LEVEL 1

5,924

23%

LEVEL 2

7,214

28%

LEVEL 3

7,050

27%

LEVEL 4

6,031

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13,908
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,372

LEVEL 1

6,164

23%

LEVEL 2

6,300

24%

LEVEL 3

7,195

27%

LEVEL 4

6,713

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14,143
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28,028

LEVEL 1

6,857

24%

LEVEL 2

7,028

25%

LEVEL 3

7,407

26%

LEVEL 4

6,736

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15,238
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 28,782

LEVEL 1

7,241

25%

LEVEL 2

6,303

22%

LEVEL 3

7,538

26%

LEVEL 4

7,700

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1,017
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,430

LEVEL 1

171

12%

LEVEL 2

242

17%

LEVEL 3

419

29%

LEVEL 4

598

42%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1,114
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,548

LEVEL 1

193

12%

LEVEL 2

241

16%

LEVEL 3

418

27%

LEVEL 4

696

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

32
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

27

34%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

23

29%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

31
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

32

41%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,175
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,068

LEVEL 1

266

7%

LEVEL 2

627

15%

LEVEL 3

1,155

28%

LEVEL 4

2,020

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,358
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,146

LEVEL 1

302

7%

LEVEL 2

486

12%

LEVEL 3

1,048

25%

LEVEL 4

2,310

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15,941
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,387

LEVEL 1

2,143

9%

LEVEL 2

5,303

23%

LEVEL 3

8,180

35%

LEVEL 4

7,761

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16,583
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,422

LEVEL 1

2,269

10%

LEVEL 2

4,570

20%

LEVEL 3

7,950

34%

LEVEL 4

8,633

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,641
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,118

LEVEL 1

3,293

46%

LEVEL 2

2,184

31%

LEVEL 3

1,094

15%

LEVEL 4

547

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,910
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,163

LEVEL 1

3,371

47%

LEVEL 2

1,882

26%

LEVEL 3

1,300

18%

LEVEL 4

610

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5,418
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,165

LEVEL 1

6,881

38%

LEVEL 2

5,866

32%

LEVEL 3

3,586

20%

LEVEL 4

1,832

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6,150
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,797

LEVEL 1

7,238

39%

LEVEL 2

5,409

29%

LEVEL 3

3,999

21%

LEVEL 4

2,151

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,377
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,775

LEVEL 1

8,732

18%

LEVEL 2

12,666

27%

LEVEL 3

13,816

29%

LEVEL 4

12,561

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28,207
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 48,343

LEVEL 1

9,017

19%

LEVEL 2

11,119

23%

LEVEL 3

14,032

29%

LEVEL 4

14,175

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

847
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,472

LEVEL 1

4,049

63%

LEVEL 2

1,576

24%

LEVEL 3

641

10%

LEVEL 4

206

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

939
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,811

LEVEL 1

4,388

64%

LEVEL 2

1,484

22%

LEVEL 3

701

10%

LEVEL 4

238

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

26,555
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 49,373

LEVEL 1

9,818

20%

LEVEL 2

13,000

26%

LEVEL 3

13,992

28%

LEVEL 4

12,563

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

28,408
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 50,006

LEVEL 1

10,196

20%

LEVEL 2

11,402

23%

LEVEL 3

14,222

28%

LEVEL 4

14,186

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

669
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,874

LEVEL 1

2,963

61%

LEVEL 2

1,242

25%

LEVEL 3

465

10%

LEVEL 4

204

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

738
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,148

LEVEL 1

3,209

62%

LEVEL 2

1,201

23%

LEVEL 3

511

10%

LEVEL 4

227

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,986
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,166

LEVEL 1

3,710

11%

LEVEL 2

7,470

23%

LEVEL 3

10,888

33%

LEVEL 4

11,098

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22,805
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,329

LEVEL 1

3,361

10%

LEVEL 2

6,163

19%

LEVEL 3

10,373

32%

LEVEL 4

12,432

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,238
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,081

LEVEL 1

9,071

43%

LEVEL 2

6,772

32%

LEVEL 3

3,569

17%

LEVEL 4

1,669

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,341
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,825

LEVEL 1

10,044

44%

LEVEL 2

6,440

28%

LEVEL 3

4,360

19%

LEVEL 4

1,981

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.