Skip to Content
Main content

WOLCOTT STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

64

19%

LEVEL 2

72

22%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

94

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

77

23%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

101

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

28

19%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

52

35%

LEVEL 4

40

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

51

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

54

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

50

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

90

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

98

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

93

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

100

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

72

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

77

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.