Skip to Content
Main content

BATAVIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

215

41%

LEVEL 2

172

33%

LEVEL 3

94

18%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

200

36%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

115

21%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

94

38%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

91

36%

LEVEL 2

83

33%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

121

43%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

26

49%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

139

35%

LEVEL 2

137

34%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

122

29%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

100

24%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

21

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

34

83%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

146

31%

LEVEL 2

152

32%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

61

77%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

54

73%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

185
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

198

36%

LEVEL 2

164

30%

LEVEL 3

114

21%

LEVEL 4

71

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

164

51%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

39

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

160

48%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.