Skip to Content
Main content

A M COSGROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

122

31%

LEVEL 4

97

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

43

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

67

40%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

82

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

182
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

11

61%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

96

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

21

66%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

21

72%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

163
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

116

36%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

217
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

77

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

72

27%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

78

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

23

24%

LEVEL 2

44

46%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.