Skip to Content
Main content

PATRICIA A DICHIARO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

104

31%

LEVEL 4

99

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

82

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

54

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

53

33%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

45

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

40

24%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

66

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

24

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

20

20%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

78

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

43

49%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

32

39%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

77

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

43

22%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.