Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT C DODSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

332

56%

LEVEL 2

155

26%

LEVEL 3

83

14%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

373

60%

LEVEL 2

145

23%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

182

58%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

195

60%

LEVEL 2

75

23%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

150

54%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

178

60%

LEVEL 2

70

23%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

17

50%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

309

59%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

56

11%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

341

62%

LEVEL 2

127

23%

LEVEL 3

71

13%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

293

55%

LEVEL 2

145

27%

LEVEL 3

76

14%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

306

56%

LEVEL 2

143

26%

LEVEL 3

79

14%

LEVEL 4

22

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

67

88%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

105

33%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

131

39%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

227

81%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

9

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

242

84%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

316

57%

LEVEL 2

143

26%

LEVEL 3

73

13%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

361

61%

LEVEL 2

137

23%

LEVEL 3

77

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.