Skip to Content
Main content

F E BELLOWS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

99

31%

LEVEL 4

134

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

62

19%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

131

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

56

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

62

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

78

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

69

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

25

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

17

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

84

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

88

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

134

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

130

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

223
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

129

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

227
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

129

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

129

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

124

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.