RICHARD J BAILEY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

132

35%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

152

39%

LEVEL 2

97

25%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

71

38%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

18

32%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

18

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

66

46%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

64

41%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

57

84%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

133
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

110

32%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

131

37%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

114

47%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.