Skip to Content
Main content

BEDFORD HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

47

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

46

35%

LEVEL 4

43

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

25

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

24

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

19

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

29

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

21

42%

LEVEL 4

22

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

10

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

16

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

46

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

40

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

46

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

79
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

39

39%

LEVEL 4

40

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

22

59%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

40

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

29

41%

LEVEL 4

29

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

28

47%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.