Skip to Content
Main content

MT KISCO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

66

24%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

62

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

64

23%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

46

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

7

70%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

36

38%

LEVEL 4

39

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

35

44%

LEVEL 4

25

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

19

61%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

22

55%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

69

41%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

44

51%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

63

61%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

21

16%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

51

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

75

45%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.