Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENSBURY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

75

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

71

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

36

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

29

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

39

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

42

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

73

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

65

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

74

38%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

45

22%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

69

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

24

71%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

46

33%

LEVEL 4

55

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

53

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

20

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

32

30%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.