J WATSON BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

264

48%

LEVEL 2

158

28%

LEVEL 3

92

17%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

263

43%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

122

20%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

110

48%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

154

47%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

145

44%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

38

68%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

98

70%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

96

62%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

157

38%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

157

33%

LEVEL 2

144

31%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

107

76%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

106

77%

LEVEL 2

19

14%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

131
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

212

43%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

178
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

216

39%

LEVEL 2

157

28%

LEVEL 3

120

22%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

212

64%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

203

56%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

132
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

261

48%

LEVEL 2

156

28%

LEVEL 3

92

17%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.