Skip to Content
Main content

LANSING CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

76

16%

LEVEL 2

141

30%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

125

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

99

20%

LEVEL 2

121

24%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

35

16%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

74

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

14

32%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

104

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

102

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

124

30%

LEVEL 4

121

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

118

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

43

69%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

125

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

279
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

95

19%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

98

28%

LEVEL 4

112

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

101

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.