Skip to Content
Main content

WAVERLY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

228

40%

LEVEL 2

185

33%

LEVEL 3

106

19%

LEVEL 4

46

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

229

38%

LEVEL 2

169

28%

LEVEL 3

121

20%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

126

42%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

113

38%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

216

40%

LEVEL 2

179

33%

LEVEL 3

99

18%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

225

39%

LEVEL 2

161

28%

LEVEL 3

117

20%

LEVEL 4

76

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

149

32%

LEVEL 2

171

37%

LEVEL 3

100

22%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

148

30%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

115

23%

LEVEL 4

75

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

79

79%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

81

81%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

168

49%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

161

43%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.