Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

72

45%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

140

59%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

29

40%

LEVEL 2

33

45%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

48

54%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

43

49%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

92

61%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

50

42%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

112

57%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

54

38%

LEVEL 2

64

45%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

112

54%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

18

95%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

47

37%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

79

47%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

61

85%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

64

45%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

131

59%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.