LORETTA PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

174

50%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

138

48%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

81

51%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

72

54%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

93

48%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

66

43%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

156

51%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

129

49%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

143

46%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

31

76%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

28

76%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

118

84%

LEVEL 2

22

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

100

76%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

171

52%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

136

49%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.