Skip to Content
Main content

TWIN PINES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

129

35%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

130

43%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

63

38%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

64

45%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

66

42%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

4

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

136

41%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

119

44%

LEVEL 2

79

29%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

127

38%

LEVEL 2

121

36%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

110

41%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

88
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

100

69%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

83

71%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

139

40%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

128

46%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.