THOMAS J LAHEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

119

26%

LEVEL 3

175

38%

LEVEL 4

119

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

180

39%

LEVEL 4

122

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

76

36%

LEVEL 4

53

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

86

42%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

99

41%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

79

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

11

46%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

17

59%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

80

24%

LEVEL 3

146

45%

LEVEL 4

88

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

133

43%

LEVEL 4

98

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

16

27%

LEVEL 2

23

39%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

11

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

27

37%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

106

26%

LEVEL 3

163

39%

LEVEL 4

118

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

88

22%

LEVEL 3

170

42%

LEVEL 4

116

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

16

38%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

25

47%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

294
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

175

40%

LEVEL 4

119

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

299
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

97

22%

LEVEL 3

177

40%

LEVEL 4

122

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

14

82%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

94

24%

LEVEL 3

162

41%

LEVEL 4

115

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

165

43%

LEVEL 4

117

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.