OTSEGO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

59

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

80

39%

LEVEL 4

54

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

41

43%

LEVEL 4

27

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

41

43%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

40

39%

LEVEL 4

32

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

35

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

23

45%

LEVEL 4

22

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

22

42%

LEVEL 4

21

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

37

46%

LEVEL 4

26

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

41

46%

LEVEL 4

23

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

32

18%

LEVEL 3

78

44%

LEVEL 4

58

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

75

41%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

137
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

80

43%

LEVEL 4

57

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

132
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

68

46%

LEVEL 4

45

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

61

41%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

14

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

10

18%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.