Skip to Content
Main content

ODESSA-MONTOUR CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

55

39%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

57

38%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

42

84%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

30

79%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

24

19%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

43

35%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

71

46%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

63

44%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.