TROY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

463

61%

LEVEL 2

199

26%

LEVEL 3

67

9%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

446

57%

LEVEL 2

179

23%

LEVEL 3

106

14%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

208

56%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

202

53%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

255

66%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

29

8%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

244

61%

LEVEL 2

88

22%

LEVEL 3

42

10%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

24

52%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

149

45%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

144

44%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

214

76%

LEVEL 2

54

19%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

189

72%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

65

69%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

87

65%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

350

55%

LEVEL 2

184

29%

LEVEL 3

67

11%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

321

50%

LEVEL 2

168

26%

LEVEL 3

102

16%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

113

88%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

125

89%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

97
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

455

61%

LEVEL 2

197

26%

LEVEL 3

67

9%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

156
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

425

56%

LEVEL 2

178

23%

LEVEL 3

105

14%

LEVEL 4

51

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

32

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

391

71%

LEVEL 2

123

22%

LEVEL 3

32

6%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

389

66%

LEVEL 2

119

20%

LEVEL 3

62

11%

LEVEL 4

19

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.