Skip to Content
Main content

MEXICO MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

108

39%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

99

33%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

58

46%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

101

39%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

96

34%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

35

74%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

35

63%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

39

30%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

74

47%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

70

42%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.