Skip to Content
Main content

PINE GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

131

31%

LEVEL 2

172

40%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

137

30%

LEVEL 2

145

31%

LEVEL 3

129

28%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

64

32%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

151

41%

LEVEL 3

78

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

17

65%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

155

42%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

96

24%

LEVEL 2

131

33%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

38

68%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

41

69%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

127

30%

LEVEL 2

170

41%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

179
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

124

28%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

51

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

13

87%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

110

44%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

88

45%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.