Skip to Content
Main content

CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

108

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

120

28%

LEVEL 4

123

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

58

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

49

24%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

64

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

50

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

59

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

102

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

114

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

108

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

122

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

26

53%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

41

72%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

108

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

43

35%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.