Skip to Content
Main content

CAMDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

148

36%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

169

37%

LEVEL 2

119

26%

LEVEL 3

123

27%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

77

38%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

83

39%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

136

35%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

161

37%

LEVEL 2

113

26%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

94

27%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

109

28%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

60

87%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

60

86%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

104

40%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

121

41%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.