Skip to Content
Main content

PS 52 JOHN C THOMPSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

65

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

72

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

34

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

33

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

38

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

14

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

57

39%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

27

21%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

43

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

40

22%

LEVEL 3

69

39%

LEVEL 4

63

35%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

69

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

24

46%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

137
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

62

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

133
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

71

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

26

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

29

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

25

17%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

43

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.