Skip to Content
Main content

PS 18 JOHN G WHITTIER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

50

46%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

52

42%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

26

21%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

43

39%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

43

38%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

43

32%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

47

45%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

59

60%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

97

46%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

39

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.