Skip to Content
Main content

PS 32 GIFFORD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

88

29%

LEVEL 4

92

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

46

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

38

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

46

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

54

34%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

14

78%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

69

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

85

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

85

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

35

39%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

24

28%

LEVEL 2

36

42%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

177
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

92

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

165
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

89

32%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

64

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

60

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

28

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

32

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.