Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #31 - STATEN ISLAND GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,493
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,366

LEVEL 1

7,200

28%

LEVEL 2

7,673

30%

LEVEL 3

5,998

24%

LEVEL 4

4,495

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,910
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 25,590

LEVEL 1

7,215

28%

LEVEL 2

6,465

25%

LEVEL 3

6,213

24%

LEVEL 4

5,697

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,143
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,227

LEVEL 1

3,235

26%

LEVEL 2

3,849

31%

LEVEL 3

2,932

24%

LEVEL 4

2,211

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,877
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,397

LEVEL 1

3,276

26%

LEVEL 2

3,244

26%

LEVEL 3

3,094

25%

LEVEL 4

2,783

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,350
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,139

LEVEL 1

3,965

30%

LEVEL 2

3,824

29%

LEVEL 3

3,066

23%

LEVEL 4

2,284

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,033
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,193

LEVEL 1

3,939

30%

LEVEL 2

3,221

24%

LEVEL 3

3,119

24%

LEVEL 4

2,914

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

136
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

190
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

97

25%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

85

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

39
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

42
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

43

38%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,520
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,204

LEVEL 1

249

11%

LEVEL 2

435

20%

LEVEL 3

673

31%

LEVEL 4

847

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,813
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,480

LEVEL 1

248

10%

LEVEL 2

419

17%

LEVEL 3

680

27%

LEVEL 4

1,133

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,354
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,221

LEVEL 1

2,159

18%

LEVEL 2

3,708

30%

LEVEL 3

3,544

29%

LEVEL 4

2,810

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6,867
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,902

LEVEL 1

2,120

18%

LEVEL 2

2,915

24%

LEVEL 3

3,436

29%

LEVEL 4

3,431

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

546
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,303

LEVEL 1

1,756

53%

LEVEL 2

1,001

30%

LEVEL 3

397

12%

LEVEL 4

149

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

675
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,286

LEVEL 1

1,734

53%

LEVEL 2

877

27%

LEVEL 3

460

14%

LEVEL 4

215

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,898
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,209

LEVEL 1

2,910

40%

LEVEL 2

2,401

33%

LEVEL 3

1,296

18%

LEVEL 4

602

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,323
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,426

LEVEL 1

2,973

40%

LEVEL 2

2,130

29%

LEVEL 3

1,511

20%

LEVEL 4

812

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,600
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,597

LEVEL 1

3,191

17%

LEVEL 2

5,806

31%

LEVEL 3

5,351

29%

LEVEL 4

4,249

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,755
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,600

LEVEL 1

3,114

17%

LEVEL 2

4,731

25%

LEVEL 3

5,400

29%

LEVEL 4

5,355

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

893
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,769

LEVEL 1

4,009

59%

LEVEL 2

1,867

28%

LEVEL 3

647

10%

LEVEL 4

246

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1,155
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,990

LEVEL 1

4,101

59%

LEVEL 2

1,734

25%

LEVEL 3

813

12%

LEVEL 4

342

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10,285
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,792

LEVEL 1

6,239

26%

LEVEL 2

7,268

31%

LEVEL 3

5,854

25%

LEVEL 4

4,431

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11,624
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,925

LEVEL 1

6,240

26%

LEVEL 2

6,061

25%

LEVEL 3

6,005

25%

LEVEL 4

5,619

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

208
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,574

LEVEL 1

961

61%

LEVEL 2

405

26%

LEVEL 3

144

9%

LEVEL 4

64

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

286
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,665

LEVEL 1

975

59%

LEVEL 2

404

24%

LEVEL 3

208

12%

LEVEL 4

78

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,059
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,878

LEVEL 1

1,752

16%

LEVEL 2

3,067

28%

LEVEL 3

3,170

29%

LEVEL 4

2,889

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,492
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,275

LEVEL 1

1,476

14%

LEVEL 2

2,307

22%

LEVEL 3

3,042

30%

LEVEL 4

3,450

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,434
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,488

LEVEL 1

5,448

38%

LEVEL 2

4,606

32%

LEVEL 3

2,828

20%

LEVEL 4

1,606

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,418
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,315

LEVEL 1

5,739

37%

LEVEL 2

4,158

27%

LEVEL 3

3,171

21%

LEVEL 4

2,247

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.