Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #29 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,458
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,325

LEVEL 1

5,521

41%

LEVEL 2

4,346

33%

LEVEL 3

2,194

16%

LEVEL 4

1,264

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,858
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,604

LEVEL 1

5,159

41%

LEVEL 2

3,587

28%

LEVEL 3

2,348

19%

LEVEL 4

1,510

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,744
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,462

LEVEL 1

2,535

39%

LEVEL 2

2,183

34%

LEVEL 3

1,118

17%

LEVEL 4

626

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,956
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,092

LEVEL 1

2,346

39%

LEVEL 2

1,790

29%

LEVEL 3

1,196

20%

LEVEL 4

760

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,714
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,863

LEVEL 1

2,986

44%

LEVEL 2

2,163

32%

LEVEL 3

1,076

16%

LEVEL 4

638

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,902
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,512

LEVEL 1

2,813

43%

LEVEL 2

1,797

28%

LEVEL 3

1,152

18%

LEVEL 4

750

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

38

47%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

40

44%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

110
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

161

41%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

140
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

172

40%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,111
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,297

LEVEL 1

519

23%

LEVEL 2

667

29%

LEVEL 3

555

24%

LEVEL 4

556

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,202
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,193

LEVEL 1

445

20%

LEVEL 2

546

25%

LEVEL 3

567

26%

LEVEL 4

635

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

111

43%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

100

44%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,665
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,207

LEVEL 1

3,748

46%

LEVEL 2

2,794

34%

LEVEL 3

1,182

14%

LEVEL 4

483

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,887
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,728

LEVEL 1

3,541

46%

LEVEL 2

2,300

30%

LEVEL 3

1,271

16%

LEVEL 4

616

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

491
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,084

LEVEL 1

944

45%

LEVEL 2

649

31%

LEVEL 3

324

16%

LEVEL 4

167

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

539
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,931

LEVEL 1

861

45%

LEVEL 2

531

27%

LEVEL 3

372

19%

LEVEL 4

167

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,266
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,732

LEVEL 1

3,699

34%

LEVEL 2

3,767

35%

LEVEL 3

2,049

19%

LEVEL 4

1,217

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,613
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,079

LEVEL 1

3,359

33%

LEVEL 2

3,107

31%

LEVEL 3

2,166

21%

LEVEL 4

1,447

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

192
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,593

LEVEL 1

1,822

70%

LEVEL 2

579

22%

LEVEL 3

145

6%

LEVEL 4

47

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

245
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,525

LEVEL 1

1,800

71%

LEVEL 2

480

19%

LEVEL 3

182

7%

LEVEL 4

63

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,362
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,227

LEVEL 1

4,783

39%

LEVEL 2

4,082

33%

LEVEL 3

2,121

17%

LEVEL 4

1,241

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,733
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,535

LEVEL 1

4,433

38%

LEVEL 2

3,369

29%

LEVEL 3

2,250

20%

LEVEL 4

1,483

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,098

LEVEL 1

738

67%

LEVEL 2

264

24%

LEVEL 3

73

7%

LEVEL 4

23

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,069

LEVEL 1

726

68%

LEVEL 2

218

20%

LEVEL 3

98

9%

LEVEL 4

27

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,086
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,586

LEVEL 1

1,343

37%

LEVEL 2

1,157

32%

LEVEL 3

653

18%

LEVEL 4

433

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,074
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,086

LEVEL 1

1,146

37%

LEVEL 2

866

28%

LEVEL 3

620

20%

LEVEL 4

454

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,372
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,739

LEVEL 1

4,178

43%

LEVEL 2

3,189

33%

LEVEL 3

1,541

16%

LEVEL 4

831

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,784
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,518

LEVEL 1

4,013

42%

LEVEL 2

2,721

29%

LEVEL 3

1,728

18%

LEVEL 4

1,056

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.