Skip to Content
Main content

PS 196 GRAND CENTRAL PARKWAY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

368
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 425

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

40

9%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

261

61%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

364
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

19

5%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

292

75%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

136

64%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

5%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

155

74%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

26

12%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

125

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

137

77%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

16

62%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

23

77%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

165
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

134

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

151
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

138

89%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

83

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

7%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

99

66%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

24

40%

LEVEL 4

21

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

26

62%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

25

7%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

252

66%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

281

77%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

13

28%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

9

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

11

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

355
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

37

9%

LEVEL 3

102

25%

LEVEL 4

253

62%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

354
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

5%

LEVEL 3

69

18%

LEVEL 4

285

76%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

300
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

22

7%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

219

67%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

285
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

13

4%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

232

78%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

42

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

60

68%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.