Skip to Content
Main content

PS 101 SCHOOL IN THE GARDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

62

21%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

121

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

156

57%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

65

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

80

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

56

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

76

61%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

13

59%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

72
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

50

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

49

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

52

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

17

14%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

73

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

14

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

20

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

119

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

58

24%

LEVEL 4

145

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

11

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

120

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

30

12%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

152

59%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

107

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

134

61%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

22

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.