PS 50 TALFOURD LAWN ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

73

20%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

71

19%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

110

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

28

17%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

62

36%

LEVEL 4

43

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

47

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

32

17%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

67

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

27
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

15

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

10

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

32

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

44

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

18

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

78

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

103

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

39

57%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

37

55%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

199
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

106

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

7

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

68

20%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

99

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.