Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #27 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,986
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,503

LEVEL 1

6,961

34%

LEVEL 2

6,556

32%

LEVEL 3

4,028

20%

LEVEL 4

2,958

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,749
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,437

LEVEL 1

6,370

33%

LEVEL 2

5,318

27%

LEVEL 3

4,366

22%

LEVEL 4

3,383

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,423
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,838

LEVEL 1

3,118

32%

LEVEL 2

3,297

34%

LEVEL 3

1,951

20%

LEVEL 4

1,472

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,884
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,385

LEVEL 1

2,884

31%

LEVEL 2

2,617

28%

LEVEL 3

2,215

24%

LEVEL 4

1,669

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,563
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,665

LEVEL 1

3,843

36%

LEVEL 2

3,259

31%

LEVEL 3

2,077

19%

LEVEL 4

1,486

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,865
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,052

LEVEL 1

3,486

35%

LEVEL 2

2,701

27%

LEVEL 3

2,151

21%

LEVEL 4

1,714

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

52
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

27

25%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

62
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

278
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 876

LEVEL 1

308

35%

LEVEL 2

290

33%

LEVEL 3

160

18%

LEVEL 4

118

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

329
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 764

LEVEL 1

219

29%

LEVEL 2

216

28%

LEVEL 3

189

25%

LEVEL 4

140

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,499
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,941

LEVEL 1

973

20%

LEVEL 2

1,469

30%

LEVEL 3

1,240

25%

LEVEL 4

1,259

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2,541
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,540

LEVEL 1

855

19%

LEVEL 2

1,144

25%

LEVEL 3

1,201

26%

LEVEL 4

1,340

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,058
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,095

LEVEL 1

432

21%

LEVEL 2

605

29%

LEVEL 3

548

26%

LEVEL 4

510

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,173
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,064

LEVEL 1

404

20%

LEVEL 2

487

24%

LEVEL 3

606

29%

LEVEL 4

567

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

842
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,621

LEVEL 1

2,343

51%

LEVEL 2

1,436

31%

LEVEL 3

610

13%

LEVEL 4

232

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

999
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,288

LEVEL 1

2,084

49%

LEVEL 2

1,205

28%

LEVEL 3

685

16%

LEVEL 4

314

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,257
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,860

LEVEL 1

2,876

37%

LEVEL 2

2,727

35%

LEVEL 3

1,445

18%

LEVEL 4

812

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,645
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,656

LEVEL 1

2,778

36%

LEVEL 2

2,233

29%

LEVEL 3

1,656

22%

LEVEL 4

989

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,499
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,257

LEVEL 1

4,325

27%

LEVEL 2

5,433

33%

LEVEL 3

3,669

23%

LEVEL 4

2,830

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,085
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,228

LEVEL 1

3,855

25%

LEVEL 2

4,288

28%

LEVEL 3

3,898

26%

LEVEL 4

3,187

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

487
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,246

LEVEL 1

2,636

62%

LEVEL 2

1,123

26%

LEVEL 3

359

8%

LEVEL 4

128

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

664
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,209

LEVEL 1

2,515

60%

LEVEL 2

1,030

24%

LEVEL 3

468

11%

LEVEL 4

196

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,750
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,435

LEVEL 1

5,668

31%

LEVEL 2

6,017

33%

LEVEL 3

3,850

21%

LEVEL 4

2,900

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,420
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,367

LEVEL 1

5,155

30%

LEVEL 2

4,792

28%

LEVEL 3

4,119

24%

LEVEL 4

3,301

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

236
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,068

LEVEL 1

1,293

63%

LEVEL 2

539

26%

LEVEL 3

178

9%

LEVEL 4

58

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

329
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,070

LEVEL 1

1,215

59%

LEVEL 2

526

25%

LEVEL 3

247

12%

LEVEL 4

82

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,196
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,079

LEVEL 1

1,366

27%

LEVEL 2

1,517

30%

LEVEL 3

1,184

23%

LEVEL 4

1,012

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,054
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,899

LEVEL 1

883

23%

LEVEL 2

962

25%

LEVEL 3

1,000

26%

LEVEL 4

1,054

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,790
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,424

LEVEL 1

5,595

36%

LEVEL 2

5,039

33%

LEVEL 3

2,844

18%

LEVEL 4

1,946

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,695
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,538

LEVEL 1

5,487

35%

LEVEL 2

4,356

28%

LEVEL 3

3,366

22%

LEVEL 4

2,329

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.