Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #26 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,415
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,410

LEVEL 1

864

8%

LEVEL 2

2,131

20%

LEVEL 3

2,895

28%

LEVEL 4

4,520

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,705
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,368

LEVEL 1

940

9%

LEVEL 2

1,723

17%

LEVEL 3

2,709

26%

LEVEL 4

4,996

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,507
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,904

LEVEL 1

354

7%

LEVEL 2

1,043

21%

LEVEL 3

1,303

27%

LEVEL 4

2,204

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,676
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,911

LEVEL 1

402

8%

LEVEL 2

833

17%

LEVEL 3

1,282

26%

LEVEL 4

2,394

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,908
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,506

LEVEL 1

510

9%

LEVEL 2

1,088

20%

LEVEL 3

1,592

29%

LEVEL 4

2,316

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,029
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,457

LEVEL 1

538

10%

LEVEL 2

890

16%

LEVEL 3

1,427

26%

LEVEL 4

2,602

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

103
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

69

49%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

124
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

75

45%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

35
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

21

38%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

32
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5,183
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,422

LEVEL 1

271

4%

LEVEL 2

968

15%

LEVEL 3

1,726

27%

LEVEL 4

3,457

54%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5,352
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,429

LEVEL 1

328

5%

LEVEL 2

749

12%

LEVEL 3

1,523

24%

LEVEL 4

3,829

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,194
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,870

LEVEL 1

211

11%

LEVEL 2

465

25%

LEVEL 3

596

32%

LEVEL 4

598

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,190
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,767

LEVEL 1

199

11%

LEVEL 2

378

21%

LEVEL 3

556

31%

LEVEL 4

634

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

225
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

114

22%

LEVEL 2

191

36%

LEVEL 3

141

27%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

272
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

115

21%

LEVEL 2

154

28%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

108

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

675
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,392

LEVEL 1

253

18%

LEVEL 2

464

33%

LEVEL 3

377

27%

LEVEL 4

298

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

735
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,406

LEVEL 1

272

19%

LEVEL 2

399

28%

LEVEL 3

400

28%

LEVEL 4

335

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,971
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,982

LEVEL 1

364

4%

LEVEL 2

1,647

18%

LEVEL 3

2,603

29%

LEVEL 4

4,368

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

7,177
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,872

LEVEL 1

400

5%

LEVEL 2

1,295

15%

LEVEL 3

2,376

27%

LEVEL 4

4,801

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

444
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,428

LEVEL 1

500

35%

LEVEL 2

484

34%

LEVEL 3

292

20%

LEVEL 4

152

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

528
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,496

LEVEL 1

540

36%

LEVEL 2

428

29%

LEVEL 3

333

22%

LEVEL 4

195

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,083
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,692

LEVEL 1

689

7%

LEVEL 2

1,920

20%

LEVEL 3

2,721

28%

LEVEL 4

4,362

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7,329
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,591

LEVEL 1

747

8%

LEVEL 2

1,515

16%

LEVEL 3

2,522

26%

LEVEL 4

4,807

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

332
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

175

24%

LEVEL 2

211

29%

LEVEL 3

174

24%

LEVEL 4

158

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

376
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

193

25%

LEVEL 2

208

27%

LEVEL 3

187

24%

LEVEL 4

189

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,795
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,978

LEVEL 1

319

6%

LEVEL 2

864

17%

LEVEL 3

1,342

27%

LEVEL 4

2,453

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,733
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,663

LEVEL 1

276

6%

LEVEL 2

654

14%

LEVEL 3

1,162

25%

LEVEL 4

2,571

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,620
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,432

LEVEL 1

545

10%

LEVEL 2

1,267

23%

LEVEL 3

1,553

29%

LEVEL 4

2,067

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,972
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,705

LEVEL 1

664

12%

LEVEL 2

1,069

19%

LEVEL 3

1,547

27%

LEVEL 4

2,425

43%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.