Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 113 ANTHONY J PRANZO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

72

11%

LEVEL 2

201

32%

LEVEL 3

204

32%

LEVEL 4

151

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

79

13%

LEVEL 2

172

28%

LEVEL 3

208

34%

LEVEL 4

155

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

73

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

71

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

78

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

79

26%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

84

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

15

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

16

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

113

34%

LEVEL 4

89

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

91

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

93

37%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

134
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

165

30%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

149

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

198

38%

LEVEL 4

149

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

38

45%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

40

43%

LEVEL 2

37

40%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

349
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

65

11%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

201

33%

LEVEL 4

148

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

356
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

204

35%

LEVEL 4

152

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

85

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.