NYC GEOG DIST #24 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,968
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,943

LEVEL 1

7,452

28%

LEVEL 2

8,523

32%

LEVEL 3

6,008

22%

LEVEL 4

4,960

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,565
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 26,334

LEVEL 1

7,650

29%

LEVEL 2

7,119

27%

LEVEL 3

6,133

23%

LEVEL 4

5,432

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,307
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,958

LEVEL 1

3,470

27%

LEVEL 2

4,181

32%

LEVEL 3

2,877

22%

LEVEL 4

2,430

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,556
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,703

LEVEL 1

3,599

28%

LEVEL 2

3,548

28%

LEVEL 3

2,925

23%

LEVEL 4

2,631

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,661
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,985

LEVEL 1

3,982

28%

LEVEL 2

4,342

31%

LEVEL 3

3,131

22%

LEVEL 4

2,530

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,009
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,631

LEVEL 1

4,051

30%

LEVEL 2

3,571

26%

LEVEL 3

3,208

24%

LEVEL 4

2,801

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

15

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

20

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

61
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,836
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,621

LEVEL 1

582

10%

LEVEL 2

1,203

21%

LEVEL 3

1,575

28%

LEVEL 4

2,261

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3,799
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,249

LEVEL 1

527

10%

LEVEL 2

923

18%

LEVEL 3

1,448

28%

LEVEL 4

2,351

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,071
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,662

LEVEL 1

579

16%

LEVEL 2

1,012

28%

LEVEL 3

1,035

28%

LEVEL 4

1,036

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,082
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,519

LEVEL 1

589

17%

LEVEL 2

848

24%

LEVEL 3

1,002

28%

LEVEL 4

1,080

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

103
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

180

40%

LEVEL 2

169

37%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

123
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

187

41%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,868
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,042

LEVEL 1

6,079

36%

LEVEL 2

6,095

36%

LEVEL 3

3,282

19%

LEVEL 4

1,586

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5,460
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,913

LEVEL 1

6,293

37%

LEVEL 2

5,160

31%

LEVEL 3

3,559

21%

LEVEL 4

1,901

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,340
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,822

LEVEL 1

4,470

20%

LEVEL 2

7,012

32%

LEVEL 3

5,527

25%

LEVEL 4

4,813

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,743
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,003

LEVEL 1

4,528

22%

LEVEL 2

5,732

27%

LEVEL 3

5,568

27%

LEVEL 4

5,175

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

628
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,121

LEVEL 1

2,982

58%

LEVEL 2

1,511

30%

LEVEL 3

481

9%

LEVEL 4

147

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

822
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,331

LEVEL 1

3,122

59%

LEVEL 2

1,387

26%

LEVEL 3

565

11%

LEVEL 4

257

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10,198
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,900

LEVEL 1

4,043

19%

LEVEL 2

6,659

32%

LEVEL 3

5,421

26%

LEVEL 4

4,777

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10,606
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,106

LEVEL 1

4,046

20%

LEVEL 2

5,454

27%

LEVEL 3

5,370

27%

LEVEL 4

5,236

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

770
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,043

LEVEL 1

3,409

56%

LEVEL 2

1,864

31%

LEVEL 3

587

10%

LEVEL 4

183

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

959
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,228

LEVEL 1

3,604

58%

LEVEL 2

1,665

27%

LEVEL 3

763

12%

LEVEL 4

196

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,925
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,832

LEVEL 1

1,662

21%

LEVEL 2

2,245

29%

LEVEL 3

1,959

25%

LEVEL 4

1,966

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,881
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,954

LEVEL 1

912

18%

LEVEL 2

1,161

23%

LEVEL 3

1,308

26%

LEVEL 4

1,573

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,043
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,111

LEVEL 1

5,790

30%

LEVEL 2

6,278

33%

LEVEL 3

4,049

21%

LEVEL 4

2,994

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,684
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,380

LEVEL 1

6,738

32%

LEVEL 2

5,958

28%

LEVEL 3

4,825

23%

LEVEL 4

3,859

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.