Skip to Content
Main content

BOERUM HILL SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

77

37%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

84

28%

LEVEL 4

64

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

32

36%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

29

36%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

41

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

35

49%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

27

53%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

30

51%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

38

81%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

40

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

59

35%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

144
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

63

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

36

34%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

53

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

61

62%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

61

51%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.