Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 383 PHILIPPA SCHUYLER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 863

LEVEL 1

209

24%

LEVEL 2

366

42%

LEVEL 3

215

25%

LEVEL 4

73

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

174

22%

LEVEL 2

258

32%

LEVEL 3

253

32%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

205

44%

LEVEL 3

121

26%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

195
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

103

26%

LEVEL 2

161

40%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

87

23%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

16

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

15

39%

LEVEL 4

17

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

77

23%

LEVEL 2

166

49%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

118
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

63

23%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

156
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

132

28%

LEVEL 2

182

39%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

196
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

147

33%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 776

LEVEL 1

134

17%

LEVEL 2

354

46%

LEVEL 3

215

28%

LEVEL 4

73

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

362
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 711

LEVEL 1

106

15%

LEVEL 2

243

34%

LEVEL 3

252

35%

LEVEL 4

110

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

75

86%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

68

81%

LEVEL 2

15

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

287
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 827

LEVEL 1

176

21%

LEVEL 2

364

44%

LEVEL 3

214

26%

LEVEL 4

73

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

363
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 759

LEVEL 1

141

19%

LEVEL 2

255

34%

LEVEL 3

253

33%

LEVEL 4

110

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

33

92%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

33

92%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

83

50%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

179

26%

LEVEL 2

283

41%

LEVEL 3

171

24%

LEVEL 4

65

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

156

24%

LEVEL 2

209

32%

LEVEL 3

208

31%

LEVEL 4

89

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.