Skip to Content
Main content

PS 222 KATHERINE R SNYDER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

79

19%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

165

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

79

18%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

210

47%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

36

17%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

88

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

104

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

77

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

106

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

41

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

79
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

61

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

85

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

106

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

25

33%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

20

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

21

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

19

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

51

15%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

151

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

188

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

301
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

163

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

327
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

63

15%

LEVEL 3

122

30%

LEVEL 4

205

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

9

26%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

28

15%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

97

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

119

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

68

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

91

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.