Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #22 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,274
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,496

LEVEL 1

3,934

27%

LEVEL 2

4,288

30%

LEVEL 3

3,356

23%

LEVEL 4

2,918

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,646
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 14,363

LEVEL 1

3,994

28%

LEVEL 2

3,723

26%

LEVEL 3

3,330

23%

LEVEL 4

3,316

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,169
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,051

LEVEL 1

1,781

25%

LEVEL 2

2,101

30%

LEVEL 3

1,717

24%

LEVEL 4

1,452

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

3,348
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,983

LEVEL 1

1,810

26%

LEVEL 2

1,825

26%

LEVEL 3

1,669

24%

LEVEL 4

1,679

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,445

LEVEL 1

2,153

29%

LEVEL 2

2,187

29%

LEVEL 3

1,639

22%

LEVEL 4

1,466

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

3,298
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,380

LEVEL 1

2,184

30%

LEVEL 2

1,898

26%

LEVEL 3

1,661

23%

LEVEL 4

1,637

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

82
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

45

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

89
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

44

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

46

36%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

56
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

49

37%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,587
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,564

LEVEL 1

395

15%

LEVEL 2

582

23%

LEVEL 3

690

27%

LEVEL 4

897

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,644
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,591

LEVEL 1

426

16%

LEVEL 2

521

20%

LEVEL 3

631

24%

LEVEL 4

1,013

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,452
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,159

LEVEL 1

642

15%

LEVEL 2

1,065

26%

LEVEL 3

1,190

29%

LEVEL 4

1,262

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,613
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,210

LEVEL 1

664

16%

LEVEL 2

933

22%

LEVEL 3

1,149

27%

LEVEL 4

1,464

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,392
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,326

LEVEL 1

2,075

39%

LEVEL 2

1,859

35%

LEVEL 3

945

18%

LEVEL 4

447

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,502
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,053

LEVEL 1

2,011

40%

LEVEL 2

1,540

30%

LEVEL 3

999

20%

LEVEL 4

503

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

709
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,184

LEVEL 1

751

34%

LEVEL 2

724

33%

LEVEL 3

464

21%

LEVEL 4

245

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

742
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,237

LEVEL 1

816

36%

LEVEL 2

679

30%

LEVEL 3

474

21%

LEVEL 4

268

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

5,852
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,593

LEVEL 1

2,259

19%

LEVEL 2

3,482

30%

LEVEL 3

3,066

26%

LEVEL 4

2,786

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

6,092
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,376

LEVEL 1

2,286

20%

LEVEL 2

2,998

26%

LEVEL 3

2,967

26%

LEVEL 4

3,125

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

422
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,903

LEVEL 1

1,675

58%

LEVEL 2

806

28%

LEVEL 3

290

10%

LEVEL 4

132

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

554
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,987

LEVEL 1

1,708

57%

LEVEL 2

725

24%

LEVEL 3

363

12%

LEVEL 4

191

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5,992
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,838

LEVEL 1

3,067

24%

LEVEL 2

3,779

29%

LEVEL 3

3,155

25%

LEVEL 4

2,837

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6,268
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,479

LEVEL 1

2,999

24%

LEVEL 2

3,212

26%

LEVEL 3

3,067

25%

LEVEL 4

3,201

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,658

LEVEL 1

867

52%

LEVEL 2

509

31%

LEVEL 3

201

12%

LEVEL 4

81

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

378
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,884

LEVEL 1

995

53%

LEVEL 2

511

27%

LEVEL 3

263

14%

LEVEL 4

115

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,539
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,491

LEVEL 1

802

18%

LEVEL 2

1,150

26%

LEVEL 3

1,228

27%

LEVEL 4

1,311

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,385
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,812

LEVEL 1

602

16%

LEVEL 2

825

22%

LEVEL 3

1,037

27%

LEVEL 4

1,348

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,735
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,005

LEVEL 1

3,132

31%

LEVEL 2

3,138

31%

LEVEL 3

2,128

21%

LEVEL 4

1,607

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,261
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,551

LEVEL 1

3,392

32%

LEVEL 2

2,898

27%

LEVEL 3

2,293

22%

LEVEL 4

1,968

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.