NYC GEOG DIST #20 - BROOKLYN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13,561
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,710

LEVEL 1

4,240

18%

LEVEL 2

5,909

25%

LEVEL 3

5,928

25%

LEVEL 4

7,633

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14,589
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 23,660

LEVEL 1

4,142

18%

LEVEL 2

4,929

21%

LEVEL 3

5,809

25%

LEVEL 4

8,780

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,520
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,425

LEVEL 1

1,967

17%

LEVEL 2

2,938

26%

LEVEL 3

2,883

25%

LEVEL 4

3,637

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,939
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,350

LEVEL 1

1,940

17%

LEVEL 2

2,471

22%

LEVEL 3

2,794

25%

LEVEL 4

4,145

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7,041
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,285

LEVEL 1

2,273

19%

LEVEL 2

2,971

24%

LEVEL 3

3,045

25%

LEVEL 4

3,996

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7,650
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,310

LEVEL 1

2,202

18%

LEVEL 2

2,458

20%

LEVEL 3

3,015

24%

LEVEL 4

4,635

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

62
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

37

34%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

82
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

49

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

42
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

12

17%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

21

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8,316
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,356

LEVEL 1

956

8%

LEVEL 2

2,084

18%

LEVEL 3

3,021

27%

LEVEL 4

5,295

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8,794
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,384

LEVEL 1

946

8%

LEVEL 2

1,644

14%

LEVEL 3

2,753

24%

LEVEL 4

6,041

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,354
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,044

LEVEL 1

1,065

18%

LEVEL 2

1,625

27%

LEVEL 3

1,651

27%

LEVEL 4

1,703

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,442
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,805

LEVEL 1

1,027

18%

LEVEL 2

1,336

23%

LEVEL 3

1,597

28%

LEVEL 4

1,845

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

156
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

152

31%

LEVEL 2

182

37%

LEVEL 3

103

21%

LEVEL 4

53

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

182
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

130

29%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

116

25%

LEVEL 4

66

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,654
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,661

LEVEL 1

2,027

36%

LEVEL 2

1,980

35%

LEVEL 3

1,118

20%

LEVEL 4

536

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2,047
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,814

LEVEL 1

2,010

35%

LEVEL 2

1,757

30%

LEVEL 3

1,289

22%

LEVEL 4

758

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,960
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,488

LEVEL 1

2,574

13%

LEVEL 2

4,954

24%

LEVEL 3

5,515

27%

LEVEL 4

7,445

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13,767
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,093

LEVEL 1

2,342

12%

LEVEL 2

3,984

20%

LEVEL 3

5,284

26%

LEVEL 4

8,483

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

601
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,222

LEVEL 1

1,666

52%

LEVEL 2

955

30%

LEVEL 3

413

13%

LEVEL 4

188

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

822
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,567

LEVEL 1

1,800

50%

LEVEL 2

945

26%

LEVEL 3

525

15%

LEVEL 4

297

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12,039
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,601

LEVEL 1

2,262

12%

LEVEL 2

4,300

23%

LEVEL 3

4,937

27%

LEVEL 4

7,102

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12,799
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,408

LEVEL 1

2,147

12%

LEVEL 2

3,462

19%

LEVEL 3

4,683

25%

LEVEL 4

8,116

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,522
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,109

LEVEL 1

1,978

39%

LEVEL 2

1,609

31%

LEVEL 3

991

19%

LEVEL 4

531

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1,790
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,252

LEVEL 1

1,995

38%

LEVEL 2

1,467

28%

LEVEL 3

1,126

21%

LEVEL 4

664

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,309
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,494

LEVEL 1

846

13%

LEVEL 2

1,339

21%

LEVEL 3

1,710

26%

LEVEL 4

2,599

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,477
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,703

LEVEL 1

526

11%

LEVEL 2

700

15%

LEVEL 3

1,127

24%

LEVEL 4

2,350

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,252
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,216

LEVEL 1

3,394

20%

LEVEL 2

4,570

27%

LEVEL 3

4,218

25%

LEVEL 4

5,034

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11,112
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,957

LEVEL 1

3,616

19%

LEVEL 2

4,229

22%

LEVEL 3

4,682

25%

LEVEL 4

6,430

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.